Nature is generally more impressive in poorer countries. Cause and effect.
Insult to injury to injury to injury. It's like tropical diseases that are almost impossible to eradicate in vectors. It's like cultural staple foods that decrease iodine uptake and are almost devoid of nutrients. It's like the balance of climate change falling where farming and subsistence depend entirely on climate and predictability.
In the city where I grew up, tornadoes only strike on the south side of town. The bad ones, anyway. (With the exception of one recent instance). Always. And that’s the poor side of town. Living to the north of that, after a number of years, I learned to not really worry during the watches that sometimes turned into warnings. Basically, we'd always be okay. It's a lulling, a complacency.
And so somehow it’s more marking, and there’s more news (or that’s my current perception) when this happens to a richer country. It’s more of a shock, so to speak - because when insult does get added to injury to injury - the magnitude, at a point, is no longer imaginable. Maybe.
Then again, tragedy is always tragedy.
And no matter where something happens, it's the poorer, less advantaged, less resourced, more dependent-on -the-natural-movements-of-the-earth that is the most devastated.
Japan.
And the fact that the US was worried about the coast of California is…well, if something thousands of miles away could have a visible, tangible, destructive effect... it just shows how small so many of the things we’re capable of doing really are. Any of the things